PREMIUM LOGIN
ClassTools Premium membership gives access to all templates, no advertisements, personal branding and many other benefits!
| Username: | ||
| Password: | ||
|
Submit
Cancel
|
||
| Not a member? | ||
1. Arrange students into groups. Each group needs at least ONE person who has a mobile device.
2. If their phone camera doesn't automatically detect and decode QR codes, ask students to
4. Cut them out and place them around your class / school.
1. Give each group a clipboard and a piece of paper so they can write down the decoded questions and their answers to them.
2. Explain to the students that the codes are hidden around the school. Each team will get ONE point for each question they correctly decode and copy down onto their sheet, and a further TWO points if they can then provide the correct answer and write this down underneath the question.
3. Away they go! The winner is the first team to return with the most correct answers in the time available. This could be within a lesson, or during a lunchbreak, or even over several days!
4. A detailed case study in how to set up a successful QR Scavenger Hunt using this tool can be found here.
Question | Answer |
| 1. A defendant may not be able to plead automatism where the automatic state is _________-__________ (4/4) | self-induced | 2. In the case of Bratty, Lord Denning gave the example of automatism where someone is suffering from ______________ (10) | concussion | 3. Self-induced automatism will not provide a defence to crimes of _______ intent where it is proved that the defendant has been reckless. (5) | basic | 4. In the case of Attorney General's Reference (No. 2 of 1992) it was held that driving without __________ was not capable of founding a defence of automatism. (9) | awareness | 5. In the case of R V T it was held that post __________ shock was an external factor capable of amounting to automatism. (9) | traumatic | 6. Self-induced automatism, where the defendant has been reckless, will act as a partial defence to crimes of ____________ intent. (8) | specific | 7. Where the defendant's automatic state has been caused by an internal factor they will not be able to plead automatism, but will instead have to plead ____________ (8) | insanity | 8. Automatism is also known as non-____________ automatism. (6) | insane | 9. Automatism is a defence in law as the defendant's actus reus will have been ________________ (11) | involuntary | 10. The case of Broome V Perkins stated that the defence of automatism will only succeed where the defendant suffered a ___________ loss of voluntary control. (5) | total | 11. This defendant was able to successfully plead automatism due to the external factor of having been raped. (8) | Antoniuk | 12. Automatism is a __________ defence, resulting in the defendant's acquittal. (8) | complete | 13. Automatism is also a ____________ defence, and so can be pleaded to any offence. (7) | general | 14. For the defence to succeed, the automatic state must have been caused by an _____________ factor. (8) | external |

Question 1 (of 14)

Question 2 (of 14)

Question 3 (of 14)

Question 4 (of 14)

Question 5 (of 14)

Question 6 (of 14)

Question 7 (of 14)

Question 8 (of 14)

Question 9 (of 14)

Question 10 (of 14)

Question 11 (of 14)

Question 12 (of 14)

Question 13 (of 14)

Question 14 (of 14)