PREMIUM LOGIN

ClassTools Premium membership gives access to all templates, no advertisements, personal branding and many other benefits!
 

Username:    
Password:    
Submit Cancel

 

Not a member?

JOIN NOW!

 
New EditShare

Duty of care

Drag and Drop the items in the right-hand column into the correct order. You can also create your own | view a sample.

  • Caparo v Dickman
  • Robinson v CC West Yorkshire
  • Topp v London Bus
  • Home Office v Dorset Yacht
  • Bourhill v Young
  • Donoghue v Stevenson
  • Hill v CC W Yorkshire
  • Osman v Ferguson
  • Kent v Griffiths
  • Vellino v CC Manchester
  • The police do not owe a duty of care to those who are injured escaping police
  • A duty of care was owed when an ambulance was culpably delayed in getting to C who was suffering an asthma attack
  • Established Lord Bridge's 3 stage test
  • It was foreseeable the borstal boys would steal the boats if unsupervised
  • There was no proximity as the crash occurred 50 feet from where the claimant was standing
  • It was not foreseeable that someone would steal the bus and kill someone
  • The police do not owe a duty of care in their detection of crime
  • No need to apply the 3rd stage of Caparo test where there is an established ground of liability
  • A school teacher formed an unhealthy attachment to a pupil and eventually shot him and his father
  • Lord Atkin established the neighbour test