PREMIUM LOGIN

ClassTools Premium membership gives access to all templates, no advertisements, personal branding and many other benefits!
 

Username:    
Password:    
Submit Cancel

 

Not a member?

JOIN NOW!

 
New EditShare

Statutory interpretation

Drag and Drop the items in the right-hand column into the correct order. You can also create your own | view a sample.

  • R v Harris
  • Fisher v Bell
  • LNER v Berriman
  • R v Allen
  • Re Sigsworth
  • Adler v George
  • Heydon's Case
  • Smith v Hughes
  • RCN v DHSS
  • Pepper v Hart
  • Sweet v Parsley
  • Maunsell v Olins
  • Pickstone v Freeman
  • Powell v Kempton Park
  • R v Inhabitants of Sedgely
  • Inland Revenue v Frere
  • The purposive approach was used to determine equal pay for women
  • Lord Simon set a two stage test for the purposive approach
  • D bit off V's nose
  • Some prostitutes were dancing in windows and on balconies
  • It is presumed a statute does not change the common law
  • D obstructed an officer in a prohibited place
  • The court had to decide if the abortions were legal
  • The nocitur a sociis rule was applied
  • The ejusdem generis rule was applied
  • Established the mischief rule
  • A flick knife was in a shop window
  • Allowed reference to Hansard
  • The expressio unius est exclusio alterius rule was applied
  • D was convicted of bigamy
  • A worker was killed whilst oiling the train track
  • A son murdered his mother and stood to inherit her estate